osewalrus: (Default)
[personal profile] osewalrus
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/A86B20D79BEB893E85258152005CA1B2/$file/17-1145-1682465.pdf

Important on Admin law and likely more important in the current Admin (it is no coincidence that the cases relied on are from the early Reagan era). When an agency stays its action pending review, is that "final agency action" subject to agency review. Court holds yes, with the majority rejecting Brown's dissent that while a denial of a stay is final agency action, grant of a stay is not. The rest is relevant to "logical outgrowth test" but mostly falls under the specifics of the Clean Air Act (note FCC has very different reconsideration statute).

Brown's dissent is typical of the anti-regulatory bias of the Federalist society. A decision to "relieve" an industry of a regulatory obligation is not considered a judicially reviewable action because -- in Brown's view -- this simply restores the natural order of the universe. Only denial of a stay constitutes a final agency action, because then the actual rule goes into effect. As the majority points out, the decision to exempt industry from otherwise extant legal obligations is a "determination of rights and obligations" under the Administrative Procedure Act. 
You may post here only if osewalrus has given you access; posting by non-Access List accounts has been disabled.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

osewalrus: (Default)
osewalrus

October 2022

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617181920 2122
23242526272829
3031     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 23rd, 2026 10:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios