osewalrus: (Default)
[personal profile] osewalrus
David Dyan makes a strong case in this article for just banning targeted advertising altogether.
https://newrepublic.com/article/147887/ban-targeted-advertising-facebook-google ;

Date: 2018-04-11 03:24 pm (UTC)
dsrtao: dsr as a LEGO minifig (Default)
From: [personal profile] dsrtao
There's probably a very acceptable compromise available: allow certain broad categories of demographic information to be used by the intermediary (the one getting money for showing the ads) but not visible to the ad originator.

Categories might be:

State of residence
Birth decade
Gender if known
user-submitted and editable keyword list

So Proctor-and-Gamble can ask Facebook to show their new deodorant ad to women in 12 states who were born in the 1980s, 90s and 00s, but:

1. P&G doesn't get to see the list, just the number of people in that category and the number who eventually saw the ad
2. P&G can't ask for anything more specific and FB can't offer it.

One more restriction, I think: if the number in a selected group goes below 100, it's not valid. Men born in 200x who live in Maryland and list "Silver Spring" and "BaltiCon" and "filking" is probably just too small a list, and a simple minimum takes care of that.

Profile

osewalrus: (Default)
osewalrus

October 2022

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617181920 2122
23242526272829
3031     

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 23rd, 2026 04:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios